What is the difference between into the wild movie and book




















McCandless wanted to have adventures outdoors and explore the unknown. In , he graduated with honors from Emory University, where he majored in history and anthropology. He donated most of the money he had to charity and stopped talking to his family. McCandless, never having been attached to possessions, wanted to live a simple, nomadic lifestyle.

A lifestyle that was very different than the norm for a college grad in He traveled the Western United States after he graduated Emory. He often worked odd jobs under aliases. He was a nomad, never staying in one place for long. McCandless did eventually make it to Alaska, where he survived for a approximately days.

Growing up with books like Harry Potter, as readers or having someone reading to us our minds wonder off to this mystical land, picturing how our. One very popular version of the famous play is the movie directed by Mr. Franco Zeffirelli.

Although most think that this version is the most accurate representation of the original play, there are still many distinct differences.

One of these key differences can. An old theory proven once again. The stack of ink and paper bound together create the unique and mysterious story; the novel and only the novel can create the same depth of character and plot. Every individual can have a.

Many historians like Richard Slotkin believe that all these aspects are what make up old western movies. Essay on Into the Wild: Book vs. Movie Words 4 Pages. During Chris journey to Alaska, he found what he was looking for an escape but also found his identity. Some say Chris was foolish but he was a smart kid in unfortunate circumstances. McCandless had many opportunities to kill big game for food, but, due to moral concerns, he struggled to kill large animals.

Without a map, McCandless was stranded in the middle of inhospitable terrain. Without experience, he let a perfectly good Caribou rot and go to waste. Without a tent, he called a bus home, which he ultimately crawled into and died. Into the Wild. Open Document. Essay Sample Check Writing Quality. It is about a young suburban man from a well to do family who hitched hiked to Alaska without informing his family.

He was Christopher Johnson McCandless, a fine man but stubborn with his own idealism. He worked in several places, made new friends, and lived where people welcomed him.

Finally he reaches Alaska, his dreamland. He was found by moose hunters dead in the bus The film shows him as lucky not to die any five minutes because of his lack of knowledge in the book you see that he was perfectly aware of what he was doing. Another point that really frustrated me was the love story they simply had to force in for the movie. Somehow it seems absolutely impossible to shoot a hollywood movie without squashing in some romance.

This scene was so completely unnecessary. Furthermore, what would have been an extremely interesting ending was left out. For his research John Krakauer had many interview with Chris family and with the people he encountered along his trip. Especially the reactions to his death were very moving.

I would have been extremely interesting if the had ended the movie with a scene showing these reactions. If there was time for shooting some stupid and unnecessary romance footage there surely would have been enough time for this aswell without making the movie too long.

However, what I really liked was the soundtrack. It was contributed by Eddie Vedder and transported the atmosphere very well. They all played their roles very convincingly.

Summing up it is evident that the book is by far better than the movie. Not that the film is bad, it just bothered me that Chris McCandless was turned into a different person. Should you only watch the film be aware that it is not as true to reality as the book.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000